• The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
Menu
  • The Four Hundred
  • Subscribe
  • Media Kit
  • Contributors
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Readers Prefer ISDB

    December 11, 2002 Timothy Prickett Morgan

    Dear Readers:

    In the article, “Use the Full-Screen Debugger with OPM Programs,” which published in the November 6, 2002, edition of Midrange Guru, I asked for your reasons why you prefer ISDB to the full-screen ILE debugger. Several of you responded.

    Here are the reasons some Midrange Guru readers prefer ISDB, in order of preference.

    Most readers liked the fact that ISBD allows you to watch the value of one or more variables as you step through the source code. The variables’ values are shown at the top of the display. STRDBG requires you to continually press F11 or use the eval command to view the value of a variable.

    The fact that you can type RUN lineno at the ISDB command line or place the cursor on a line (and press F13), to which ISDB runs and stops regardless of breakpoints, is the second highest preference among readers.

    The least preferred choice is ISDB’s use of different colors for the different types of source lines. Source code lines are shown in green by default, but comments are in white, I/O operations are in red, nesting structures are purple, and array definitions are shown in blue.

    Here are some of the additional comments I received.

    Thom wrote:

    The watch command exists in both debuggers with very different operations behind them. I find both watch operations useful and, in fact, I feel that each debugger really needs to have the other’s WATCH command along side its own.

    The one thing I don’t like about the ILE debugger is the fact that I no longer have the option of turning off the interactive portion of it and using the old trace listing methods. Occasionally when debugging a run of large amounts of data where very few records are in error, I find it more convenient to look at a trace listing.

    Lynne wrote:

    On the other hand, STRDBG is superior to STRISDB for two reasons.

    Using WATCH on a variable halts program execution when the variable changes, which is invaluable when you have NO idea where in the program the field value is being changed and/or corrupted.

    This choice is much friendlier to use when debugging a serviced job. On my shop’s system we have so many jobs active at any given time that it is a pain to find your job in the list provided by STRISDB.

    Toni wrote:

    It is confusing using both versions as the function keys are different.

    Thank you, Larry, Thom, Pam, Rich, Lynne, Ken, Pete, Fred, Bob, and Toni for your input.

    — Ted

    Sponsored By
    inFORM DECISIONS

    ELIMINATE THE COSTS OF PRE-PRINTED FORMS, LABOR AND POSTAGE WITH
    inFORM Decisions iDocs™ ‘Suite’

    iSeries based e-Forms, e-Checks, e-Mail, e-FAX, and Document Retrieval from the Web are available as individual modules or as a complete e-Document processing ‘Suite’.

    Click to Download the Complete Suite or Individual Modules today
    www.inFORMDecisions.com

    or call (800) 858-5544

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Tags: Tags: mgo_rc, Volume 2, Number 92 -- December 11, 2002

    Sponsored by
    ARCAD Software

    DevSecOps & Peer Review – The Power of Automation

    In today’s fast-paced development environments, security can no longer be an afterthought. This session will explore how DevSecOps brings security into every phase of the DevOps lifecycle—early, consistently, and effectively.

    In this session, you’ll discover:

    • What DevSecOps is and why it matters?
    • Learn how to formalize your security concerns into a repeatable process
    • Discover the power of automation through pull requests, approval workflows, segregation of duties, peer review, and more—ensuring your data and production environments are protected without slowing down delivery.

    Whether you’re just getting started or looking to enhance your practices, this session will provide actionable insights to strengthen your security posture through automation and team alignment to bring consistency to the process.

    Watch Now!

    Share this:

    • Reddit
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Email

    Performance of the SQL LIKE Predicate Reader Feedback and Insights: RPG Compiler Directives and V4

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

MGO Volume: 2 Issue: 92

This Issue Sponsored By

    Table of Contents

    • SBMJOB’s RQSDTA Parameter
    • Subfile Positioning
    • Readers Prefer ISDB

    Content archive

    • The Four Hundred
    • Four Hundred Stuff
    • Four Hundred Guru

    Recent Posts

    • What You Will Find In IBM i 7.6 TR1 and IBM i 7.5 TR7
    • Three Things For IBM i Shops To Consider About DevSecOps
    • Big Blue Converges IBM i RPG And System Z COBOL Code Assistants Into “Project Bob”
    • As I See It: Retirement Challenges
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 27, Number 41
    • Stacking Up Power11 Entry Server Performance To Older Iron
    • Big Blue Boosts IBM i Support In Instana, Adds Tracing
    • It Is Time To Tell Us What You Are Thinking And Doing
    • IBM i PTF Guide, Volume 27, Number 40
    • The GenAI Boom Is Only Slightly Louder Than The Dot Com Boom

    Subscribe

    To get news from IT Jungle sent to your inbox every week, subscribe to our newsletter.

    Pages

    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Contributors
    • Four Hundred Monitor
    • IBM i PTF Guide
    • Media Kit
    • Subscribe

    Search

    Copyright © 2025 IT Jungle